Information Regarding Sessions
Paper presentations may be submitted either individually using this form or as a pre-defined group of two or more authors. Accepted paper proposals submitted individually will be grouped with others on a common theme and will be allocated 30 minutes as part of either a 60- or 90-minute session. The abstract should detail the focus of the presentation.In this format, authors present abbreviated versions of their papers, followed by comments/critique and audience discussion.
Please note that there will be only basic technical aids such as PC, speakers and projector available.
Bring along handouts if you wish to share your work and/or offer a further visual aid.
Symposiums are 60-minute multipaper presentations focusing on different aspects of the same topic. Introductory presentation of several papers (authors) is than followed by discussion and feedback. The abstract should detail the focus of the presentations. A symposium provides an opportunity to examine specific research issues, problems, or topics from a variety of perspectives. They may present alternative solutions, interpretations, or contrasting points of view on a specific subject, or in relation to a common theme. Often they feature a panel discussion format.
In the interest of making the conference a real place to exchange ideas and experience in a creative way, we offer the opportunity to propose and run a workshops to discuss on-going research in an open way, share best practice and experience, etc. Workshops offer a forum for discussion of a broad range of emerging topics of interest, they are more interactive and informal than paper sessions, and they can involve extended discussion, group brainstorming, and networking for further collaboration.
Workshop proposals must include a clear description of:
- Workshop goals.
- Methods, that are going to be used.
- Outcomes for the participants.
This formal graphic presentation of your topic offers an opportunity for gathering detailed feedback on your work. Posters will be presented after Friday’s lunch break. An abstract should detail the focus of the presentation.
- Recommended dimensions of Poster: 0.60 m width x 0.85 m height.
- Poster orientation: Portrait
The posters should be set up as early as possible to be visible for the duration of the conference, but presenters are expected to be present at their poster between 14.00 and 14.30 on Friday September 20.
All texts should be prepared according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001, 5th edition; for more details, please see: http://www.apastyle.org) and should be double-spaced.
Manuscripts for full paper should be between 3,000 and 5,000 words in length (including references, tables and figures). All papers will be double blind peer reviewed and must follow standard academic conventions (APA).
Authors are required to have their papers edited (checked) by a native English speaker.
Papers must consist of following data:
Try to be short, concise and informative.
Author names and affiliations.
Please give all details as you wish them to appear in publication. Give full name of your organization, full postal address, including the country name, and, if available, the e-mail address of each author.
Clearly indicate who is willing to handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. Ensure that telephone and fax numbers (with country and area code) are provided in addition to the e-mail address and the complete postal address.
The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the main results and major conclusions. It should be max. 250 words long.
Give 3 -5 key words representing main issues raised in your paper.
Arrangement of the paper
Divide paper into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1.1 (then 1.1.1, 1.1.2), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is not included in section numbering). Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line.
State the objectives of the paper and provide background, avoid a detailed literature survey and summary of the results.
Give adequate review of literature supporting your work and explaining your research.
Results should be presented clearly and concisely.
This should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeating them. Reference to literature should be precise and adequate.
The main conclusions of the study may be presented with reference to the practice if necessary.
If there is more than one appendix, they should be identified as A, B, etc.
Figure captions, tables, figures, schemes.
Present these at the end of the paper. They are described in more detail below. High-resolution graphics files must always be provided separate from the main text file. The locations of the figures etc. must be represented in the text (e.g. (Figure 1.).
Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text. Place footnotes to tables below the table body and indicate them with superscript lowercase letters. Be careful in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in tables do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the text.
Responsibility for the accuracy of references lies entirely with the authors.
Citations in the text.
Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa).
Citing and listing of Web references.
As a minimum, the full URL should be given. Any further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.), should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.
References should be arranged first alphabetically and then further sorted chronologically if necessary. More than one reference from the same author(s) in the same year must be identified by the letters “a”, “b”, “c”, etc., placed after the year of publication.
Reference to a journal publication:
Smith, J., (2000). On writing a scientific article. In: Journal of Scientific Communications, Vol. 163, pp. 51-59.
Reference to a book:
Smith, J., (1979). On writing papers. (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
Smith, R., & Baker, L. B. (1994). How to write papers. In: R. Jones, & R. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to research (pp. 281-304). New York: E- Publishing Inc